• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

[基础知识] 给ICB免疫减毒增效的 药物(十九)--肌苷、β-葡聚糖

[复制链接]
2905 0 自学自救 发表于 昨天 17:11 |

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
第一部分 肌苷
) _. X3 H+ ~0 J+ C( {" I+ w# M + _5 P# y/ m, N1 ^/ M9 k: m; Y

6 e. A( W) Y/ j$ v! V《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》 一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验:/ T6 X2 O% P  ]; U) e2 y8 n* p

* P% _6 `/ [5 `/ W# ?2 C9 m1、入组患者:172名晚期实体瘤患者,分为 ICB免疫治疗+肌苷组和 ICB免疫治疗组不联合肌苷(该组部分患者联合了化疗或者靶向)两组,每组86名患者。4 j+ Q" e4 Z, w- x, c

. E' j5 w- g/ F  b, h0 g8 H: G2、肌苷用法:口服肌苷片,每天三次,每次0.2克。; S7 W- O" {( R- Y% _# S
. J/ }% W! ]2 e: y! g" l- D
3、试验结果:肌苷组和非肌苷组中位PFS (95% CI)分别为7.00(5.31-8.69)和4.40(3.10-5.70)个月(风险比[HR]0.63;95%置信区间为0.44–0.90,p= 0.011),肌苷组PFS提高有统计学意义。ORR分别为26.7%和15.1%(p= 0.061),肌苷组ORR有改善。非肌苷组中位OS为29.67个月(95% CI 17.40–41.94),肌苷组中位OS尚未达到。
" Q$ r! l: ~- E/ g5 h/ @! }$ A( `0 e9 E
0 `: p* b. C. q5 ?7 q) ?' \" ~* J# n肌苷组和非肌苷组分别有25名(29%)和31名(36%)患者出现3级和4级不良反应,肌苷组的不良反应趋于减少。
8 u: o! @2 F0 }4 W$ r& Z
( ?, I+ b# l8 d* B + D) N4 T; b! L1 A

! s5 h8 {! y- ^5 T" w7 w( E第二部分 β-葡聚糖
6 n, ]! ]" L" j' l" @  x0 _
+ O  B5 u. v- ~) [- Q & U( s8 ~* l# n0 v) F6 D4 Q
《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验,β-葡聚糖+pd-1i 恩沃利 + 抗血管生成药物治疗先前pd-1i治疗失败的非小细胞肺癌。
2 g  X4 f! l* ?7 |' R 0 _% c0 \7 R+ ?8 H
1、入组患者:23名晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者之前用pd-1i治疗都已经失败。' z! L! y8 ?* f/ D

" h) O7 x2 d4 a2、β-葡聚糖用法:每天两次,每次500毫克。
3 e, [, }6 F8 Q : T6 Y6 \6 i& T; g4 g8 L8 D2 l
3、试验结果:ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9%.,PFS 4.3个月,OS 8.9个月。PD-L1阳性和阴性亚组之间的mPFS有显著差异(6.3个月对2.3个月,p = 0.002)。
3 h8 H9 a3 e0 @3 h! J$ H+ h; f8 n. \
2 N0 g. S( t; Z52.2%的患者发生了治疗相关的不良事件。最常见的原因是甲状腺功能减退(26.1%)和疲劳(26.1%)。报告了2例(8.7%)3级不良事件。未观察到与死亡相关的不良反应。
+ s2 ~4 H, m# |% w ; H9 Q0 o2 q% G- f) q- J1 y0 a5 m4 @
蛋白质组学分析显示CASP-8、ARG1、MMP12、CD28和CXCL5的水平与对治疗的抗性相关,而CD40-L和EGF的水平与有利的反应相关。0 T  v% m5 \" v* z& G

# C- O, D' g' W5 @' g# p# Z& c(因为患者都是之前用pd-1i都已经失败的患者,所以ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9% 还是很不错的)
$ M+ E7 R" E- x$ y; w ! Q. R! R, Z1 Q8 K

! J' i- J- w% l" W+ ?I 《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》& e; h: K/ G! k0 N& s3 I6 q* P

2 d0 |) c( h3 z( uBackground: This study aimed to evaluate whether inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in human malignant solid tumors.* X  W, z, s& I) f% @
7 t1 i! J9 e) ~# a: m0 K( M# J
Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted, from January 2021 to December 2022, in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, and participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the inosine (trial) or non-inosine (control) group that received inosine (dosage: 0.2 g, three times/day) + PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor or only PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor ± targeted ± chemotherapy, respectively. Efficacy was assessed every 6 weeks (i.e., after every two-three treatment cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05809336).0 ~; i- w( J8 B; m9 ?

' h$ t8 I4 j9 {1 v$ ^1 TResults: Among the 172 participants with advanced malignant solid tumors, 86 each were assigned to the inosine and non-inosine groups, wherein the median PFS (95% CI) was 7.00 (5.31-8.69) and 4.40 (3.10-5.70) months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.011), and the ORR was 26.7% and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.061). In the inosine and non-inosine groups, the median OS was not reached and was 29.67 (95% CI 17.40-41.94) months, respectively (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.59-1.84], p = 0.874). Compared with the non-inosine group, the median PFS and ORR of the inosine group were significantly prolonged and improved in the multiple exploratory subgroup analyses. The safety analysis showed that Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25 (29%) and 31 (36%) patients in the inosine and non-inosine groups, respectively, and tended to decrease in the inosine group compared with the non-inosine group.
/ U6 B- b" Q, }6 u
$ W) S- Z2 z: vConclusion: Inosine had a tendency to enhance the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and reduced immunotherapy-related adverse reactions." f) Y7 q, t" H: \/ u9 A6 r
% r6 J, h' L# U0 L1 P3 C1 y
; \* B! a, L+ c. E
8 f7 D2 J- d& D7 W
II 《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》
! z! s  N' [, C, s0 y; Y ) ], o2 m1 n( Y: ]! @; ^
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). β-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received β-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis.5 a$ ?0 H$ K, W0 s+ j4 f

8 B' e6 V! G4 M) WResults: Twenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0-6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2-12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response.# O' g  m- c: E# @  d
, A. f! u2 }2 R+ j. U3 n3 D4 y
Conclusion: β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表